- The Tribunal has decided that the app BOLT’s services fall under the Tour Operator Margin Scheme (TOMS), despite HMRC’s initial position.
- The Court did not rely on the Uber decision for employment law.
- The Court’s case-law in Star Coaches was distinguished and may have been overruled in subsequent cases.
- Whether it is desirable for the supplies to be taxed at their margin is a policy question, not a legal one.
- The Tribunal considered post-Brexit CJEU case-law, despite the supplies occurring after Brexit.
Source Fabian Barth
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust vs HMRC: VAT Exemption Dispute on Locum Medical Practitioners
- HMRC Guidance: How to correct VAT errors and make adjustments or claims (VAT Notice 700/45)
- Supreme Court Decision Mandates Prudential to Pay VAT on £9.3 Million Success Fees
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Grouping and Time of Supply in Prudential Case
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds UK on Input Tax Recovery Without VAT Invoices
