- The case involves the application of the reverse charge mechanism for VAT.
- The taxpayer provided personnel for construction works related to immovable property.
- The taxpayer did not dispute that the VAT charged to them was for the provision of personnel for construction works.
- The reverse charge mechanism means that the VAT is levied on the recipient of the supply, not the supplier.
- The recipient cannot claim a deduction for VAT incorrectly charged by the supplier.
- Payment on a G-account is not relevant in this case.
- The taxpayer’s argument that the assessment should be reduced due to VAT correction in a previous year is rejected.
- The taxpayer’s claim of reliance on a 2012 report is not accepted as it does not establish a legally enforceable expectation.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Classification of Parking Lot Parcels with Paving: A-G’s Conclusion on VAT Status
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline