Advocate General Szpunar concludes that Hungary’s disregard of additional information provided during an objection procedure for a VAT refund application is contrary to EU law, regardless of whether the information could have been provided earlier. This is only acceptable if Hungarian law provides effective legal remedies in case the proceedings are terminated.
Source Taxlive
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on Global E-Invoicing/E-Reporting/SAF-T Developments, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ State Aid C-360/25 (X) – Questions – Does the exemption under art. 135(1)(d) of the VAT Directive constitute State Aid?
- EU and Indonesia conclude negotiations on free trade agreement
- ECJ Case: VAT Treatment of Loyalty Points vs Vouchers Under EU Directive
- FISC Hearing on Tax Implications of Trump Administration Policies September 23
- VAT Rules for Virtual Game Currencies: EU Court Advocate General Opinion
