Advocate General Szpunar concludes that Hungary’s disregard of additional information provided during an objection procedure for a VAT refund application is contrary to EU law, regardless of whether the information could have been provided earlier. This is only acceptable if Hungarian law provides effective legal remedies in case the proceedings are terminated.
Source Taxlive
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on Global E-Invoicing/E-Reporting/SAF-T Developments, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Council Approves Customs Duty Cuts on Ukrainian Agri-Food Products
- EC Report: Three EU Countries Account for 75% of VAT Rate Deviations
- EU Report Reveals Major Disparities in VAT Rate Exception Applications
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on Place of Supply of Intra-Community Acquisitions – ”Triangulation” (Art. 42)
- Briefing document & Podcast: C-536/08 (X) and C-539/08 (Facet Trading) – No deduction on Intra-EU acquisitions taxed at the MS of identification of the purchaser, instead of the destination
