The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal rules that the additional VAT assessment was rightly imposed on B bv and that X as director was rightly held liable for it. The recipient makes it plausible that only B bv has entered into legal relationships for the deliveries of the telephones with encryption software and the SIM cards. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
