- In Poland, a gym owner in Bydgoszcz was denied a claim for a VAT adjustment by the tax authorities
- Advocate General Kokott argued that the taxable amount should be based on the consideration paid by the customer, excluding VAT
- The gym owner had a claim for a refund of tax levied in breach of EU law
- The tax authorities’ argument that refunding the VAT would unjustly enrich the gym owner was dismissed
- The tax authorities had provided no proof that the gym owner had passed on the burden of the additional VAT to its customers
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
For the Opinion, click HERE
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 AG Opinion
- Comments on ECJ C-639/24: Limits on Denying VAT Exemption for Intra-Community Supplies
- EU Advocate General: VAT Implications of Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Car Distribution Cases
- EU and Member States Introduce €2-€5 Parcel Customs Fees Ahead of 2026 Reforms
- ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – AG Opinion – VAT Adjustments in Intra-Group Transfer Pricing Not Separate Supplies
