Listen HERE
See also
- C-378/21 (P GmbH) – Judgment – No VAT liability in case wrongly charged VAT for B2C transactions
- C-453/22 (Schütte)- Judgment – Claim for reimbursement of excess VAT paid to suppliers even after statutory limits are passed
- C-355/22 (Osteopathie Van Hauwermeiren) – Judgment – A national court cannot use a national provision to maintain certain effects of a provision of national law that it has deemed incompatible with the Directive
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23
- VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Insights from Acromet Towercranes Case
- CJEU Ruling: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Impact VAT in Arcomet Case (C-726/23)
- EU Court of Justice Rules Transfer Pricing Payments Subject to VAT in Arcomet Case
