- The dispute involves claims for overpaid output tax on the sale of demonstrator motor vehicles between 1973 and 1996.
- The taxpayers initially accounted for VAT on the profit margin of these vehicles but later submitted claims based on the interpretation of the law in the case of Commission v Italian Republic.
- HMRC accepted these claims and settled them in 2006 under a section 85 agreement.
- However, it was later discovered that there were errors in the calculation methodology used for the claims, resulting in larger claims.
- The taxpayers submitted new claims in 2009, but HMRC rejected them.
- The taxpayers appealed, and the Upper Tribunal (UT) set aside the earlier decision due to errors of law.
- The UT concluded that the section 85 agreement precluded the taxpayers from making any further claims, even if they were valid under the correct methodology.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust vs HMRC: VAT Exemption Dispute on Locum Medical Practitioners
- HMRC Guidance: How to correct VAT errors and make adjustments or claims (VAT Notice 700/45)
- Supreme Court Decision Mandates Prudential to Pay VAT on £9.3 Million Success Fees
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Grouping and Time of Supply in Prudential Case
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds UK on Input Tax Recovery Without VAT Invoices
