- An Alabama taxpayer challenged an audit assessment issued by the Department of Revenue (DOR).
- The audit assessment included sales tax due for the period of November 2010 through February 2016, along with a fraud penalty.
- The taxpayer argued that the assessments were time-barred and that the DOR’s markup percentages were excessive.
- The taxpayer also claimed that the DOR’s sales calculations should have been reduced for theft and spoilage.
- The DOR argued that the assessments were timely and that the markup percentages were reasonable.
- The Alabama Tax Tribunal upheld most of the audit assessment but directed the DOR to recalculate the sales tax final assessment by eliminating periods outside the statute of limitations and removing the fraud penalty.
Source: salestaxinstitute.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United States"
- U.S. Sales Tax Explained: Key Rules, Nexus, Exemptions, and Compliance Steps for Businesses
- Utah Approves New Emergency Services Sales Tax and Modifies Rural Health Care Tax Rules
- Committee Urges Voters to Renew 1% Sales Tax for Bibb County School Improvements
- Florida DOR Proposes Changes to Sales Tax Rules for Export Sales and Documentation Requirements
- Washington Imposes Sales Tax on Digital Ads: Higher Costs for Amazon Sellers Starting October 2025