- The decision was made by the Administrative Court on September 6, 2023.
- The case number is Ro 2020/15/0018.
- The main legal principle is that services are attributed to the person who provides them in their own name.
- It is important to carefully consider whether a third party is simply an executing organ in relation to a “foreign” exchange of services or if they become the subject of the exchange through their arrangement.
- The recipient of the service is the one who has contractually requested the service.
- A commission agent could also be considered a recipient of the service.
- The European Case Law Identifier for this case is ECLI:AT:VWGH:2023:RO2020150018.J02.
Source: ris.bka.gv.at
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Austria"
- Austrian Court Denies Input VAT Deduction for Incorrect Invoice from Nonresident Supplier
- Leitner & Leitner conference (Vienna) – ”Saddle Festival into the New Year – Tax Tips for 2026” (Dec 4)
- Austrian Court Denies Input VAT Deduction for Incorrect Invoices from Nonresident Service Providers
- Austria Clarifies E-Invoicing Rules for Foreign Companies Supplying Federal Agencies via Peppol
- EU’s Operation Escape Room Exposes €140 Million Cross-Border VAT Fraud Network Across Six Countries













