The High Court recently made comments about VAT in a case involving Uber Britannia Ltd. The court was trying to determine the identity of the operator, whether it was the driver or Uber. This was important because it affected the validity of the license. Veezu, an interested party, explained that different contractual arrangements had different VAT outcomes. The court concluded that VAT is a result of the contractual arrangement, not a factor in understanding it. Tripartite arrangements are complicated, and VAT is a tax on supply, not money movement.
Source Accountingweb
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Chancellor’s VAT Exemption Removal for Healthcare Speculated, Government Denies £2 Billion Revenue Promise
- Wes Streeting Rules Out VAT on Private Healthcare in Upcoming Budget
- VAT Exemption for Locum Doctors: Impact on NHS Trusts and Recruitment Agencies
- HMRC to Release Preliminary VAT Gap Estimate for 2024-2025 on November 26, 2024
- Keir Starmer Faces Criticism for Not Ruling Out VAT Increase Amid £30bn Financial Gap
