- Piramal Healthcare UK Ltd imported pharmaceutical goods for processing, testing, or research purposes
- HMRC decided that Piramal was not entitled to any input tax recovery as it did not own the drugs
- The First-tier Tribunal rejected Piramal’s appeal, stating that import VAT could only be recovered if Piramal owned the goods
- The FTT disregarded arguments presented by Piramal regarding VAT on imports of goods belonging to others and regulations accepting the party claiming input tax need be described as importer or owner
- The FTT also largely disregarded guidelines issued by the EU VAT Committee
- The FTT dismissed Piramal’s appeal, with only a slight adjustment to the assessed period.
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Deductibility for Professional Fees in Share Sale Transactions
- UK Tribunal Rules Personalized Book Services VAT-Exempt as Primary Supply is Book Production
- 2025: Celebrity Traitors, Trump’s Tariffs, and the Year Tax Law Got Even Weirder
- UK to Mandate B2B E-Invoicing for All VAT Invoices Starting April 2029
- Audit Office Monitors Council’s VAT Filing Amid Potential £600k HMRC Fine Risk














