The Calcutta High Court has ruled in favour of refunding a penalty in a case involving a 9-hour time gap between the expiration of an e-way bill and the interception of the associated vehicle. The judgment was delivered by a Single bench of Justice Md. Nizamuddin, who noted that there was no evidence of the petitioner’s intent to evade tax.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- India’s GST Council Recommends Tax Exemptions, Simplified Structure, and Rate Reductions Effective September 22
- Nirmala Sitharaman Explains GST Reforms Using Popcorn Example to Highlight Classification Challenges
- GST Overhaul: Cheaper Small Cars, Bikes; Higher Tax on Premium Vehicles from September 22, 2025
- GST Revamp: 40% Tax on Sin Goods and Luxury Items Explained
- GST Council Unveils Next-Gen Reforms: Export Services, Refunds, Tribunal, and Rate Simplification
