- The Court of Appeal in ‘s-Hertogenbosch has ruled that X cannot use the margin scheme.
- X’s designation on the purchasing statements, “Margin scheme!”, is too brief and open to interpretation.
- Additionally, X has not provided sufficient evidence that the suppliers did not deduct the turnover tax as input tax.
- The inspector has imposed additional assessments for 2016 and 2017.
- The court has determined that the amount of the additional assessments was wrongly reduced in the first instance.
- Both X’s appeal and the inspector’s incidental appeal are justified.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients














