Where EU law rights are fiscally inconvenient, Member States may sometimes try to delay their implementation. In particular, they might attempt to refuse refunds of unduly charged VAT, to their own enrichment and the detriment of businesses. Gladly, the Court shows little mercy with such attempts. This is not generous, but plainly necessary: Had it been otherwise, Member States might impose taxes in breach of EU law, knowing full well that they can get away with it for a few years before being challenged.
Source Fabian Barth
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Free Products” (Art. 16)
- Briefing document & Podcast: C-438/13 (BCR Leasing Case) – Relief for Leasing Firms Facing Asset Non-Recovery
- VAT Neutrality and Tax Fraud: Implications of Recent Jurisprudence
- Blog Luc Dhont: How Can Multinationals Comply with VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments Post-ECJ Arcomet?
- ECJ Opinion Sheds Light on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
