The VAT exemption for transfers of money requires the service to comprise the actual effecting of a transfer of legal title in the funds. It is not sufficient if it sets off a chain of events inevitably and automatically leading to the transfer. This interpretation by the UK Supreme Court of the CJEU’s case-law is perhaps beyond reproach – but it does render the exemption painfully narrow, and leads to services being taxed that are integral to the overall transfer and, from a consumer’s perspective, just as indistinguishable. As I have argued in my paper before, this might be an area where the post-Brexit UK can consider legislative intervention.
Source Fabian Barth
See also
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Nutella Biscuits Win VAT Exemption: Tribunal Rules Chocolate Is Filling, Not Coating
- UK Tribunal Clarifies VAT Exemption for Welsh-Regulated Private Welfare Services in Supported Living Case
- Employment Agency’s Reimbursed Medical Staff Costs Not Exempt from VAT, Tribunal Rules
- VAT Exemption for Welfare Services Applies to Both English and Welsh Operations, Tribunal Rules
- HMRC Updates VAT Deduction Rules for Overseas Insurance Intermediary Services After Tribunal Decision
