- The Dutch Supreme Court has referred questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding the difficult burden of proof faced by a director in relation to VAT debts.
- The case involves a director who was held liable for unpaid taxes by the tax authorities, despite having stepped down as director and transferring the company to a new owner.
- The issue at hand is whether the burden of proof placed on the director is in line with the principle of proportionality under EU law.
- The questions referred to the CJEU ask whether EU law prohibits a regulation that makes it extremely difficult for a director to avoid liability for tax debts if the company fails to report payment difficulties.
- The CJEU will also consider whether the director’s good faith and diligent actions are relevant in determining liability.
- The case will be put on hold until the CJEU provides its ruling.
- The Dutch Supreme Court has confirmed that the heavy sanctions imposed on directors for unpaid taxes are intended and provided for by the legislature.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026














