- The Amsterdam Court of Appeal upheld the information decision made by the tax inspector in 2014, stating that lawyer X’s administration did not meet legal standards.
- X’s objections were deemed incorrect and the burden of proof was increased and reversed.
- The Supreme Court had previously established the provision of information regarding the 2008 and 2009 tax years.
- Additional tax assessments and fines will be imposed in 2020.
- The Court found that the corrections made by the inspector were plausible and that X did not provide a rebuttal. X’s appeal was deemed unfounded and the fines remained in force, though they were moderated due to exceeding the reasonable period.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands Raises Accommodation VAT to 21%, Keeps 9% Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports
- Uncertainty Over VAT on Pension Premiums: State Secretary Maintains Policy Amid Conflicting Court Rulings
- Uncertainty Over VAT on Pension Premiums: State Secretary Maintains Policy Amid Conflicting Court Rulings
- Pension Administration Remains a Single VAT-Exempt Service Pending Supreme Court Decision
- State Secretary Rejects Court Rulings: Pension Premiums Remain VAT-Exempt Pending Supreme Court Decision
