- The Amsterdam Court of Appeal upheld the information decision made by the tax inspector in 2014, stating that lawyer X’s administration did not meet legal standards.
- X’s objections were deemed incorrect and the burden of proof was increased and reversed.
- The Supreme Court had previously established the provision of information regarding the 2008 and 2009 tax years.
- Additional tax assessments and fines will be imposed in 2020.
- The Court found that the corrections made by the inspector were plausible and that X did not provide a rebuttal. X’s appeal was deemed unfounded and the fines remained in force, though they were moderated due to exceeding the reasonable period.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
