The qualification of a transaction as a “normal” supply of goods — as such relevant for VAT purposes — or as a transfer of a business or a going concern — out of VAT scope — is still a topic to consider. Over time, a considerable number of case laws on such topic have provided guidelines that have not always been persuasive and sometimes even inconsistent, and that, in many cases, have been influenced by contexts with elements of fraud. Moreover, in the Italian framework, many case laws have been affected both by the civil law rules and by the so-called alternativity rule between VAT and registration tax (i.e., one transaction cannot be subject to both taxes).
Source Baker & McKenzie
Latest Posts in "Belgium"
- Belgium Confirms E-Invoicing Mandate Scope, Grace Period, and Rules for Nonresidents from 2026
- Belgium Confirms 2026 E-Invoicing Mandate: Key Scope, Fallback, and Technical Updates Explained
- Belgium Grants Three-Month Grace Period for E-Invoicing Penalties Starting January 2026
- Tolerance Period of 3 months for E-Invoicing Implementation in Belgium
- Belgium Mandates B2B Structured e-Invoicing from 2026: Key Dates, Grace Period, and Penalties













