- The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has confirmed that a recipient of an invoice has a direct claim against the tax authorities, even if the issuer of the invoice invokes the defense of prescription.
- The German tax administration has adopted the principles of the ECJ’s decision, but with additional requirements and limitations.
- The ECJ emphasizes that the right to deduct input VAT is an integral part of the principle of neutrality and can only be denied in cases of fraud or abuse.
- The ECJ also states that if the issuer of the invoice changes the original invoice and requests a refund of the VAT from the tax authorities after the recipient has already claimed the input VAT deduction, this would be considered abusive and should be rejected.
- The ECJ’s decision strengthens the rights of businesses, and if there are difficulties in enforcing claims during VAT corrections, a direct claim against the tax authorities should be considered.
- The restrictive views of the tax administration may no longer be valid after the ECJ’s recent decision.
Source: umsatz-steuer-beratung.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- New ECJ VAT Case T-680/25 (Mercedes Benz) – No details known yet
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 3 Judgments, 3 AG Opinions till November 13, 2025
- Trickiest countries in which to achieve compliance
- EU VAT Guide: Disbursements vs Recharges Classification and Tax Implications