- The High Court decision in Uber v Sefton Borough Council could result in VAT being added to cab fares for private hire operators.
- This would be the largest increase in the VAT burden since 2010 and may disproportionately affect those who are least able to afford it.
- Currently, private hire operators treat themselves as agents for private journeys, charging a fee to the driver for business introductions.
- The driver retains the fare and is responsible for any taxes, including VAT.
- However, the Sefton MBC case means that private hire operators cannot act as agents in London, most of England, and Wales, and must pay VAT on the full fare received by the driver if acting as a principal.
- Using HMRC guidance that does not apply to specific circumstances would not be a defence against an HMRC assessment or a successful argument in court.
Source mha.co.uk
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Morrisons Loses Appeal on Aluminium Foil Origin; HMRC Anti-Dumping Duty Upheld by FTT
- UK to End £135 Customs-Free Parcel Threshold, Aligning with US and EU Import Reforms
- VAT Exemption for Management Trustee Services in Residential Flats: Places for People v HMRC
- UK Ride-Hailing Firms to Charge VAT on Full Fares Starting January 2026
- HMRC Launches Import Control System 2 for Goods Moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland
