1 Facts
The object of G’s sole proprietorship was the acquisition of real estate assets. G was the sole shareholder and managing director of the plaintiff, a limited liability company (GmbH). The plaintiff’s business objective was the letting and management of real estate.
2 Reasons for the decision
In view of the plaintiff’s clear financial and organisational integration into G, the economic integration need not be so clear. All that is required is a reasonable economic link.
3 Consequences for the practice
After a series of decisions on the admissibility of the German VAT group per se and the integration of partnerships, the BFH has now again dealt with economic integration. Significant in this respect are the BFH’s comments on indirect economic integration.
Source: www.kmlz.de
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- BFH Clarifies VAT Rules for Single- and Multi-Purpose Vouchers After ECJ Ruling
- Germany Updates E-Invoicing FAQ: New Clarifications on Transmission and Compliance for 2025
- Comprehensive VAT Guide – Germany (2026)
- ecosio Webinar: 8 Key considerations for Germany’s E-Invoicing Mandate
- End of Cuxhaven Free Zone and Updates to Customs and Energy Tax Penalties in Germany
