This case involves BV X, BV Y, and BV Z within a conglomerate of Dutch and Swiss AGs, primarily engaged in creating pools of lottery tickets in a foreign lottery and selling shares in those pools. The tax inspector imposed VAT reassessments on BV X, BV Y, and BV Z for the period between 2001 and 2005. The dispute revolves around whether BV X provided VAT-exempt gambling services, the place of service for BV Y and BV Z’s services, and the application of the principle of trust. After various appeals, the Supreme Court referred the case of BV Z to the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal to determine the recipient of BV Z’s advertising services. The Court ultimately reduced the VAT reassessment to €10,473,681, rejecting BV Z’s claims of trust violation.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
