- X, a sales tax fiscal entity, bought a car in 2017 and sold it to its sole shareholder for part of the purchase price.
- X filed a dividend tax return for a disguised dividend and reclaimed sales tax for the third quarter of 2017, including input tax for the car purchase.
- However, the inspector imposed an additional assessment for the year 2017 and disputed whether X was entitled to deduct input tax.
- The North Holland District Court ruled that X was not the purchaser of the car and therefore not entitled to deduct VAT.
- The court also found that the inspector failed to demonstrate conditional intent for the offense fine but showed gross negligence, resulting in a reduced misdemeanor fine of 25%.
- The appeal was well-founded and the misdemeanor fine was further reduced by 15% due to exceeding the reasonable period for handling the case.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands Prepares for 2030 VAT Reforms: E-Invoicing, Platform Economy and SME Considerations
- No VAT Exemption for Medical Services in Staffing Maternity Care Personnel, Court Rules
- Fiscal Requirements and POS Regulations in the Netherlands and Curaçao: A Comprehensive Overview
- Court Rules Low-Care Hospice Room Rentals with Meals Subject to VAT, Allowing Tax Deduction
- Consultation on BPM Refund Changes for Export: Focus on Vehicles Under Twelve Years