The CESTAT, Mumbai in M/s. Hiranandani Builders v. Commissioner of Service Tax-VII, Mumbai [Service Tax Appeal No. 86258 of 2016 dated August 28, 2023] set aside the demand order and held that, the Revenue Department does not have authority of law to collect service tax on services provided by SEZ developer to units in SEZ within SEZ area.
Source a2ztaxcorp
Latest Posts in "India"
- VAT Pre-Deposit Refund Must Be Paid in Cash Under GST, Rules Madras High Court
- Karnataka High Court: Limitation for GST Refund Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- Karnataka High Court: GST Refund Limitation Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- GST Refund Limitation is Mandatory, but High Courts Can Condon Delay in Genuine Hardship Cases
- DGFT Tightens Certificates of Origin Rules, Mandates Automated Verification and Authorised Issuance
