- Michael Schütte, a farmer and forestry farmer, purchased wood from suppliers at a VAT rate of 19% and sold it as firewood to his customers at a VAT rate of 7%.
- He declared his sales at a rate of 7% after deducting input tax on purchases at a rate of 19%.
- After legal proceedings, it was ruled that Schütte’s purchases were also subject to the reduced rate of 7%, reducing his input tax deduction.
- The tax authorities imposed additional assessments, but Schütte’s suppliers refused to correct the invoices due to the limitation period.
- Schütte requested the tax authorities to remit the additional VAT, but they rejected the request.
- The ECJ ruled that the recipient of a supply of goods has a direct right to a refund of the VAT wrongly charged, including interest, from the tax authorities if they can no longer claim repayment from their suppliers due to the limitation period and there is a formal possibility for suppliers to claim a refund later.
- If the wrongly levied VAT is not refunded within a reasonable period, default interest must be paid.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
See also
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Electricity Breakdown at Customs: HS 8502 or HS 8504 – 0% or 10% Duty?
- Conference Vienna University: Court of Justice of the European Union: Recent VAT Case Law (March 10-12)
- Comments EGC T-643/24: Unauthorised Music Use Qualifies as VAT-Taxable Service
- EU Approves Updated E-Invoicing Standard EN 16931-1 for B2B and 2030 Digital Reporting
- EPPO Uncovers €11.3M Customs Fraud in Antwerp Steamboat Probe; Three Arrested













