The High Court of Bombay has held that the State Tax Officer (STO) does not have the jurisdiction to issue communication under Section 83 of the Maharastra Goods and Services Tax (MGST) Act, 2017. The STO voluntarily withdrew the communication and Bombay HC disposed the Writ Petition in consequent to the withdrawal.
Source: www.taxscan.in
Latest Posts in "India"
- VAT Pre-Deposit Refund Must Be Paid in Cash Under GST, Rules Madras High Court
- Karnataka High Court: Limitation for GST Refund Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- Karnataka High Court: GST Refund Limitation Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- GST Refund Limitation is Mandatory, but High Courts Can Condon Delay in Genuine Hardship Cases
- DGFT Tightens Certificates of Origin Rules, Mandates Automated Verification and Authorised Issuance
