The High Court of Bombay has held that the State Tax Officer (STO) does not have the jurisdiction to issue communication under Section 83 of the Maharastra Goods and Services Tax (MGST) Act, 2017. The STO voluntarily withdrew the communication and Bombay HC disposed the Writ Petition in consequent to the withdrawal.
Source: www.taxscan.in
Latest Posts in "India"
- Supreme Court: VAT Credit Cannot Be Denied Due to Supplier’s Tax Default
- Trickiest countries in which to achieve compliance
- India announces changes in the Invoice Management System
- GST: India’s Grand Federal Bargain Becomes Imperfect Political Compromise After Eight Years
- GST 2.0 Boosts Bengal’s Economy with Rate Cuts on Local Goods and Industries
