- The Court of Appeal ruled that X was wrongly denied access to the KOR and does not owe VAT on the contribution.
- The inspector failed to show a direct connection between the contribution and X’s activities.
- X is an association that maintains BSA engines and requested the KOR be applied from 1 January 2020.
- The District Court ruled that X is only a VAT entrepreneur for specific sales and not for the contribution.
- The inspector must return €3339 to X. The Court of Appeal confirmed this ruling, stating that X acts as a cost-sharing center rather than an organizer of activities.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
