Question about private use has not yet been answeredIn this case, the appeal was rightly declared admissible, according to the Supreme Court. The question of whether the employees’ commuting qualifies as private use of the car provided was not appropriate for mass objection. The Supreme Court has therefore not answered this question. There is also no answer to that question in the collective decision on the objection. The same applies to the question of whether part of the fixed lease costs should also be allocated to the private use of the cars.
Source: pkfwallast.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
