The Court of Appeals added to the District Court’s ruling that although the magic truffles contained essential nutrients, they were exclusively consumed for a purpose other than ingesting those nutrients. Magic truffles were solely consumed for their hallucinogenic effects. Due to these effects, magic truffles could only be consumed in small quantities, making the intake of necessary nutrients negligible. As a result, magic truffles were not similar to the products with which Company X compared them.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands Prepares for 2030 VAT Reforms: E-Invoicing, Platform Economy and SME Considerations
- No VAT Exemption for Medical Services in Staffing Maternity Care Personnel, Court Rules
- Fiscal Requirements and POS Regulations in the Netherlands and Curaçao: A Comprehensive Overview
- Court Rules Low-Care Hospice Room Rentals with Meals Subject to VAT, Allowing Tax Deduction
- Consultation on BPM Refund Changes for Export: Focus on Vehicles Under Twelve Years
