The FHC held that the supply of satellite network bandwidth capacities (which was the service rendered) was made through the appellant’s transponder in Nigeria and, therefore, held that the services (regardless of their intangible nature) cannot be considered to be supplied outside Nigeria. Given this, the FHC decided that the service was rendered in Nigeria and, thus, subject to VAT.
Source: mondaq.com
Latest Posts in "Nigeria"
- Pass-Through Costs: Tax Implications of Reimbursable Expenses for VAT and WHT in Logistics
- Is Commercial Rent Subject to VAT Under Nigeria’s 2025 Tax Act?
- Why Exporters Must Still Pay VAT on Local Purchases in Nigeria: Common Misconceptions Explained
- Nigeria Centralises VAT Collection as Customs Exits, NRS Takes Over Amid Sweeping Tax Reforms
- Nigeria VAT Compliance: Navigating TaxPro Max for Digital and Non-Resident Suppliers
