The FHC held that the supply of satellite network bandwidth capacities (which was the service rendered) was made through the appellant’s transponder in Nigeria and, therefore, held that the services (regardless of their intangible nature) cannot be considered to be supplied outside Nigeria. Given this, the FHC decided that the service was rendered in Nigeria and, thus, subject to VAT.
Source: mondaq.com
Latest Posts in "Nigeria"
- Federal Government Insists on New Tax Reform Despite IATA’s Criticism Over International Treaty Violations
- Stakeholders Criticize New Tax Reforms as Nigerian Government Insists Airlines Must Pay VAT
- Nigeria to Enforce VAT on Non-Resident Digital Services from 2026
- Nigeria Extends E-Invoicing Compliance Deadline for Large Taxpayers to November 2025
- FIRS Launches E-Invoicing Platform to Enhance Tax Compliance and Transparency in Nigeria