The FHC held that the supply of satellite network bandwidth capacities (which was the service rendered) was made through the appellant’s transponder in Nigeria and, therefore, held that the services (regardless of their intangible nature) cannot be considered to be supplied outside Nigeria. Given this, the FHC decided that the service was rendered in Nigeria and, thus, subject to VAT.
Source: mondaq.com
Latest Posts in "Nigeria"
- Nigeria VAT Compliance: Navigating TaxPro Max for Digital and Non-Resident Suppliers
- Why Nigeria’s Most Vibrant States Receive Less VAT Revenue Than They Generate
- Nigeria Mandates E-Invoicing for SMEs, Sets Timeline for Full Digital Tax Compliance
- Nigeria Sets E-Invoicing Compliance Deadlines: Phased Rollout Begins April 2026 for Large Taxpayers
- NCAA Orders Overland Airways to Refund Passengers Wrongly Charged VAT Before January 2026














