The determination of the prescriptive period and the assessment of tax liabilities during tax audits require careful consideration due to some of its complexities. In a recent case decided by the Supreme Court concerning a domestic corporation (petitioner), the significance of the prescription period in assessing value-added tax (VAT) deficiency and the issue of VAT imposed on interest on loan transactions were brought to the forefront. The decision, in this case, hinged on the impact of the taxpayer’s amendment of return to the prescriptive period to assess and on when loan transactions are considered incidental business transactions subject to VAT.
Source: philstar.com
Latest Posts in "Philippines"
- BIR Falls Short of VAT Collection Target by P6.37 Billion in First Seven Months
- Philippine Court Clarifies Input VAT Refunds for Zero-Rated Sales in Electricity Sector Case
- Philippine Court Clarifies Input VAT Refunds for Zero-Rated Sales in Automotive Export Case
- Philippine Court Clarifies Input VAT Refunds for Zero-Rated Sales to PEZA Entities
- Philippines Maintains Digital VAT Despite Trump’s Tariff Threats on American Tech Giants
