- The District Court of Gelderland has ruled that X BV, a company focused on providing support to sports clubs and athletes, can rightfully invoke the Rompelman judgment as a ‘start-up’.
- The company’s preparatory work can be considered economic activities. X BV’s VAT deduction of €40,044 was disputed by the inspector who claimed that the company was a pure holding company and not a VAT entrepreneur.
- However, the court ruled in favor of X BV, stating that it is not a pure holding company as it has been managing the group from the start and is involved in marketing, sales, personnel policy, intellectual property acquisition, and customer acquisition.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Penalty for VAT Reduced Due to Incidental Carelessness; Court Lowers Fine to €1,500
- Thrift Shops Return to Court to Challenge VAT on Second-Hand Goods
- E-invoicing and Digital Reporting for Cross-border Transactions Starting July 2030
- Amendment to VAT Assessment Decision on Tank Cards and Interest Charges
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
