Although there may have been a beneficial psychological impact on undergoing such treatments and this may have been the reason for a patient to proceed (and they may be recommended by qualified medical professionals) this, in itself, was insufficient to persuade the judge that the services were exempt. Consequety, the appeal was rejected and the assessment was upheld.
Source: marcusward.co
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Updates VAT Refund Guidance for New Charity Buildings and DIY Housebuilders Scheme
- Supreme Court Rules NHS Trusts Must Charge VAT on Car Parking Without Binding Legal Exemption
- VAT Penalty Overturned: Tribunal Accepts Combined Personal and Operational Crises as Reasonable Excuse
- HMRC Signals VAT Reform: Care Home Crackdown and Major Capital Goods Scheme Threshold Hike
- HMRC v Moir Management: Penalties for Failure to Notify Notifiable Arrangements and Reasonable Excuse Considered
