Although there may have been a beneficial psychological impact on undergoing such treatments and this may have been the reason for a patient to proceed (and they may be recommended by qualified medical professionals) this, in itself, was insufficient to persuade the judge that the services were exempt. Consequety, the appeal was rejected and the assessment was upheld.
Source: marcusward.co
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- City of Portsmouth College v HMRC: VAT on Government Grants for Free Education Services
- Understanding VAT Obligations and Reliefs for Charities in the UK
- Guide to Claiming VAT and Import Duty Repayments: Eligibility, Process, and Requirements
- AI in Tax: Balancing Innovation and Risks in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape
- Deos Group.co.uk Ltd Wins Appeal Against HMRC on VAT Input Tax Disallowance and Penalty
