The Court of Appeal of The Hague ruled that X was still a VAT entrepreneur even after 6 January 2016 and that the additional VAT assessment was therefore rightly imposed. There is also no right to a refund of VAT on the basis of art. 29 OB Act 1968, because X does not make it plausible that the claim against D BV is irrecoverable. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No deduction of input tax for private advisory fees shareholders
- Dutch Tax Law Clarifies Data Reporting Rules for Small Business Scheme
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible
