The Court of Justice of the EU lists when a company that is not established in the EU does not have a vi. This case concerns a Swiss service recipient with a Belgian service provider legally separate from her.
Source Taxlive
See also
- ECJ C-232/22 (Cabot Plastics Belgium) – Judgment – Toll manufacturing with ancillary services does not lead to Fixed Establishment
- Summary of ECJ-232/22 (Cabot) – No fixed establishment due to lack of human and technical resources even if ancillary services are performed, exclusivity
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Maximizing VAT Recovery: Essential Tips for Businesses
- EU Announces VAT Digital Age Implementation Strategy to Combat Fraud and Modernize System
- ECJ Rules on VAT Treatment of Mobile App Services Before 2015
- EPPO Indicts 36 Suspects in €24.3 Million VAT Fraud Scheme
- EU Court Rules on VAT Liability for App Store Digital Platform Sales
