The Court of Justice of the EU lists when a company that is not established in the EU does not have a vi. This case concerns a Swiss service recipient with a Belgian service provider legally separate from her.
Source Taxlive
See also
- ECJ C-232/22 (Cabot Plastics Belgium) – Judgment – Toll manufacturing with ancillary services does not lead to Fixed Establishment
- Summary of ECJ-232/22 (Cabot) – No fixed establishment due to lack of human and technical resources even if ancillary services are performed, exclusivity
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Scope of Standstill Clause in VAT Directive for New EU Member States: Spanish Representation Expenses
- EU Refers Spain to Court for Failing to Transpose VAT Directives into National Law
- EU Refers Spain to CJEU Over Failure to Transpose Two Key VAT Directives
- EU Court Rules VAT Applies to In-Game Asset Sales; Not Exempt as Financial Services
- ECJ Rules VAT Applies to Trading In-Game Assets for Real Money, In-Game Gold Not Exempt
