The Court of Justice of the EU lists when a company that is not established in the EU does not have a vi. This case concerns a Swiss service recipient with a Belgian service provider legally separate from her.
Source Taxlive
See also
- ECJ C-232/22 (Cabot Plastics Belgium) – Judgment – Toll manufacturing with ancillary services does not lead to Fixed Establishment
- Summary of ECJ-232/22 (Cabot) – No fixed establishment due to lack of human and technical resources even if ancillary services are performed, exclusivity
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ICS2 Implementation for Northern Ireland: Transition Details and Support for Carriers by HMRC
- EU Court Upholds VAT Exemption for Exported Goods Despite Initial Intra-EU Delivery Intentions
- Consultation on European CBAM rules
- From Accounting Entry to Taxable Event: The Acromet Case and VAT-TP Implications
- DG TAXUD Extends ICS2 Road and Rail Transport Deadline to December 31, 2025
