This ruling concerns the interpretation of Art. 311 (1) no. 1 of the VAT Direction. It has been issued in the course of a legal dispute between IT and the Belgian state regarding the refusal of the Belgian tax authorities to apply margin taxation to certain sales of vehicles carried out by IT.
Source KPMG
See also
- Summary of ECJ C-365/22: Definitively end-of-life motor vehicles acquired by an undertaking and intended to be sold “for parts” without removing any parts are considered second-hand good
- ECJ C-365/22 (Belgian State) – Judgment – Purchase of end-of life motor vehicles which are intended to be sold ‘for parts’ constitute second-hand goods
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU’s ViDA in Motion: How EU Member States Are Preparing for implementing Digital Reporting Requirements (DRR)
- EU Court Rules Triangulation VAT Simplification Inapplicable to Multi-Party Drop Shipments Involving Fraud
- EU Commission Seeks Feedback on Revising E-Invoicing Rules for Public Procurement
- CBAM from 2026: New TARIC Codes Mandatory for Import – No Correct Coding, No Import Approval
- Navigating VAT Exemptions: Recent ECJ Judgments and Their Implications for Intra-Community Transactions and Imports
