This ruling concerns the interpretation of Art. 311 (1) no. 1 of the VAT Direction. It has been issued in the course of a legal dispute between IT and the Belgian state regarding the refusal of the Belgian tax authorities to apply margin taxation to certain sales of vehicles carried out by IT.
Source KPMG
See also
- Summary of ECJ C-365/22: Definitively end-of-life motor vehicles acquired by an undertaking and intended to be sold “for parts” without removing any parts are considered second-hand good
- ECJ C-365/22 (Belgian State) – Judgment – Purchase of end-of life motor vehicles which are intended to be sold ‘for parts’ constitute second-hand goods
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-101/24 (Xyrality) – Judgment on app stores as VAT commissionaires
- ViDA Q&A: Can authorities impose an E-Invoicing mandate for domestic transactions if recipient is not established in that Member State?
- European Parliament Highlights VAT Compliance and Tax Clarity as Keys to Growth
- Maximizing VAT Recovery: Essential Tips for Businesses
- EU Announces VAT Digital Age Implementation Strategy to Combat Fraud and Modernize System
