- In 2014, agreements were made between VOF X and Stichting X for the transfer of assets, right of use, takeover of care activities, and rental of office space.
- In 2019, a settlement agreement was reached between the partners of VOF X (now VOF A) and Stichting X for compensation.
- The dispute is whether the amount agreed upon in 2019 is related to the 2014 transfer.
- The court believes that the company was transferred in its entirety to Stichting X in 2014, despite the unfortunate way in which the agreements were recorded.
- The payment in 2019 is part of the transaction and falls under Section 37d of the OB Act. The details of the transfer are not relevant for the application of this section.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026
