The Court of Appeal of The Hague rules that the BV has made it plausible that inventory has been purchased. The following circumstances lead to this conclusion:the BV runs a business for which it needs an inventory;the control officer has seen the inventory in the store;the BV submits an invoice from the transferring BV for the takeover of the inventory for the indicated amount, including VAT.
Source: fiscount.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Confirms Denial of VAT Refund Due to Insufficient Proof of Unpaid Invoice
- VAT Rules for Unpaid Invoices: When Can Entrepreneurs Reclaim or Repay VAT?
- No VAT Refund for X: Failure to Prove VAT Payment on Uncollectible Claim; Appeal Dismissed
- Reduced VAT Rate Not Applicable to Artistic Murals, Only to Residential Painting and Plastering
- Court Holds VAT Adjustment Dispute over City Hall Resolved by Settlement Agreement
