The taxpayer failed to prove that all the conditions for claiming the input tax deduction were met. The costs for which the deduction was requested were not invoiced to the investor, nor were there any documents indicating the investor’s consent or changes in the lease agreement. The taxpayer’s claim that the costs were incurred for future projects was unsupported by evidence. The court determined that the costs were incurred for a company engaging in exempted activities, not the taxpayer’s taxable activities, thereby affirming the disallowance of the input tax deduction.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
- Comments on T-184/25: Transfers of credit portfolios and VAT: AG puts credit management exemption under pressure
- New Four-Year VAT Adjustment for Investment Services on Real Estate Starting 2026
- VAT refund rightly refused due to unproven previous payment
- VAT Rules for Unpaid Invoices: When Can Entrepreneurs Reclaim or Repay VAT?
