- The Belgian company CEZAM has appealed against three decisions by the Belgian tax authorities, which imposed fiscal fines for CEZAM’s failure to submit periodic VAT returns for several years.
- CEZAM disputes the amount of the fines, which correspond to 20% of the amount of VAT that would have been due before deduction of the deductible VAT. CEZAM argues that such fines should be based on the amount of VAT actually due, after deduction of the deductible VAT, in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
- The CJEU has stated that national regulations imposing a flat-rate fine of 20% of the amount of VAT that would have been due before the deductible VAT was credited are not precluded by Article 273 of the VAT Directive, provided that the proportionality of the fine is verified by the referring court.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
See also
- Summary of ECJ C-418/22: National legislation can penalize failure to declare and pay VAT with a flat-rate fine of 20% of the VAT amount due, after deducting deductible VAT, as long as the fine is proportionate
- ECJ C-418/22 (Cezam) – Judgment -Authorities are allowed to impose penalties on underpaid VAT without considering input VAT
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-101/24 (Xyrality) – Judgment on app stores as VAT commissionaires
- ECJ Confirms Deemed Reseller Rule for App Store In-App Purchases
- VAT Challenges in Toll Manufacturing: Goods vs Services Classification Issues
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 case pending
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-580/16 (Hans Bühler) – Late submission of recapitulative statements should not disqualify a business from exemptions
