The legality of VAT penalties and their compatibility with EU law is a frequent topic in litigation. In the recent case of CEZAM, the Court did not declare penalties imposed under Belgian law as per se disproportionate, but it was acknowledged that in some cases, such penalties could breach EU law. The assessment of penalties must be made on a case-by-case basis. Taxpayers should challenge authorities if the penalty seems excessive, especially if no tax revenue was lost.
Source Fabian Barth
See also
- C-712/17 (EN.SA Srl) – Judgment – Refusal of deduction of input tax and VAT zero-rate in case of fictitious actions
- Summary of ECJ C-418/22: National legislation can penalize failure to declare and pay VAT with a flat-rate fine of 20% of the VAT amount due, after deducting deductible VAT, as long as the fine is proportionate
- ECJ C-418/22 (Cezam) – Judgment -Authorities are allowed to impose penalties on underpaid VAT without considering input VAT
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-101/24 (Xyrality) – Judgment on app stores as VAT commissionaires
- ECJ Confirms Deemed Reseller Rule for App Store In-App Purchases
- VAT Challenges in Toll Manufacturing: Goods vs Services Classification Issues
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 case pending
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-580/16 (Hans Bühler) – Late submission of recapitulative statements should not disqualify a business from exemptions
