The CESTAT, Chennai in the case of M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. The Commissioner of G.S.T and Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No. 41500 of 2019 dated April 26, 2023] held that recovery of liquidated damages from defaulting party cannot be said to be towards any service, since the purpose of imposing damages is to ensure that the defaulting act is not undertaken or repeated.
Source a2ztaxcorp
Latest Posts in "India"
- When Supplier Defaults, Recipient Loses GST ITC: Conflicting High Court Rulings and Legal Analysis
- GSTN Launches Offline Invoice Management System (IMS) Tool; Issues Detailed User Advisory
- SEBI Asks GST Council to Resolve Tax Issues in Physically Settled Commodity Derivatives
- No Reverse Charge Demand if Service Provider Has Fully Paid Service Tax: CESTAT Hyderabad
- Bombay High Court: GST Not Applicable on Complete Assignment of Leasehold Rights as Sale
