The Supreme Court reviews the reverse charge mechanism for value-added tax (VAT). The appellant argues that the identity of the purchaser should be known for the reverse charge mechanism to be applicable, as it helps prevent VAT fraud and abuse. The Supreme Court considers relevant laws and EU directives related to the reverse charge mechanism. It concludes that the identification of the purchaser is necessary for the proper implementation of the mechanism. The Court also addresses principles such as legal certainty, proportionality, trust, and fiscal neutrality. It states that in cases where the purchaser’s identity is unknown, the reverse charge mechanism does not apply, and the supplier is liable for VAT. The Court confirms the decision of the lower court, stating that the appellant did not dispute the unknown identity of the purchaser. Therefore, the lower court’s ruling is upheld.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Payment received: no compensation for transfer of totality of assets
- Parcel from China on average € 6 more expensive from January 2026
- No VAT refund for the customer if VAT has not been levied retrospectively at the supplier
- Dutch Court Denies Input VAT Deduction for 2016 Due to Statute of Limitations Expiry
- Preliminary questions to the ECJ in VAT case on the application of the transfer of a totality of assets
