AG Ettema concluded that VAT exemption for healthcare services should be assessed at the individual institution level, not at the level of a VAT fiscal unity.
The case involves a BV providing 24-hour remote care to both the parent foundation and third parties.
The VAT fiscal unity is seen as having an administrative function without external legal effect.
The Supreme Court’s decision could have significant financial implications for VAT treatment of healthcare services within fiscal unity.
Source: meijburg.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
- Decree on Mediation in Securities Transactions with Instructions on the Scope of the Concept of Mediation Published
- Tax Penalty for VAT Reduced Due to Incidental Carelessness; Court Lowers Fine to €1,500
- Thrift Shops Return to Court to Challenge VAT on Second-Hand Goods
- E-invoicing and Digital Reporting for Cross-border Transactions Starting July 2030
