Fluvius Antwerpen, an electricity distribution network operator, summoned an individual called MX to pay for unlawfully used electricity. The case raised questions about the VAT treatment of such scenarios, specifically whether the electricity should be regarded as a supply of goods or a transfer of ownership by order of a public authority. The Court ruled that the supply of electricity, even if involuntary and due to unlawful conduct, constitutes a supply of goods for consideration. The Court also noted that Fluvius Antwerpen’s activities correspond to a public service obligation and therefore fall within the definition of a body governed by public law. However, the supply of electricity is not subject to VAT only if it is negligible in scale and economic impact, which is not the case in this scenario.
Source KPMG
See also C-677/21 (Fluvius Antwerpen) – Judgment – Unlawful use of energy is a supply of goods
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ C-472/24 (Žaidimų valiuta) – AG Opinion – VAT Treatment of In-Game Gold Transactions
- ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko Operations) – AG Opinion – VAT Treatment of Loyalty Program Points
- ECJ Upholds Czech Joint VAT Liability in Fuel Fraud Case, Validates EU Law Compliance
- CJEU Rules on VAT for Transfer Price Adjustments in Arcomet Towercranes Case C-726/23
- Agenda of the ECJ VAT cases – 4 AG Opinions, 1 Hearings till October 10, 2025
