The District Court of Gelderland has ruled that dental treatment and observation services are separate and that the medical exemption does not apply to observation services. X, a partnership of five dental practices, provides emergency dental treatment and charges an observation fee. The court has ruled that X owes turnover tax on the observation service as it is a separate service. X’s appeal has been deemed unfounded, as they should have known based on a previous consultation process that the inspector’s position did not align with information on the Tax and Customs Administration website.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT refund for uncollectible debt: bankruptcy period starts, error regarding cash accounting is no excuse
- No refund of import VAT on show jumping horse: prize money and subsidies do not constitute an economic activity
- VAT deduction for construction costs of a home office when rented to a private limited company is permitted
- Tax Deduction for VAT Possible When Renting Out Roof for Solar Panel Operation, Says Advocate General
- Dutch Court Upholds €2.5M VAT Assessment for Metal Trader Over UK Customer Fraud Awareness
