The municipality of Nijmegen, which owned all the shares in BV X, an ice rink and convention center complex, requested that BV X stop charging value-added tax (VAT) for the rental of the ice function due to the expansion of the sports VAT exemption. BV X refused to comply with the request, leading to a legal dispute with the municipality. BV X claimed that the municipality owed them a 10% VAT compensation fee due to the fact that BV X could no longer deduct VAT. However, the court ruled that the agreement did not apply in this case and rejected BV X’s claims. The court also rejected BV X’s argument that the contract should be revised due to unforeseen circumstances.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
