The case concerns a dental partnership (X) which receives an observation fee for emergency observation services provided to patients of other dental practices. The question is whether X is liable for VAT on this fee. The District Court Gelderland rules in favor of the tax authority, stating that there are separate legal relationships and services provided to different customers, and X is liable for VAT on the observation fee. The court also notes that X cannot rely on information from the Tax and Customs Administration’s website that suggests otherwise.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
