The two shareholders in a dental practice devised a construction whereby, as a medical company not subject to VAT, they still hoped to be able to reclaim the VAT on the purchase price of a business premises in full. That failed, after which they held the financial adviser they had engaged in the purchase liable at the Amsterdam court.
Source: fiscaalvanmorgen.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Authority Offers Option for Digital Mail Starting December 2025
- Court Confirms Additional Tax Assessment and Denies Reliance on Small Business Scheme and Trust Principle
- VAT Deduction Denied for Advisory Costs in Family Business Succession: Dutch Court Clarifies Criteria
- VAT Increase Threatens Entire Tax Plan in Dutch Parliament
- Cabinet Seeks Alternatives to VAT Hike on Culture, Eyes Unusual Tax Exemptions
