The two shareholders in a dental practice devised a construction whereby, as a medical company not subject to VAT, they still hoped to be able to reclaim the VAT on the purchase price of a business premises in full. That failed, after which they held the financial adviser they had engaged in the purchase liable at the Amsterdam court.
Source: fiscaalvanmorgen.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Rules Sale-and-Leaseback Property Transfer Not Exempt from Transfer Tax
- Court Ruling: VAT Directive Violations, Zero Rate Conditions Unmet, Tax Reassessed, Penalties Partially Overturned
- Faster VAT Entrepreneur Qualification in Real Estate Transactions: Key Considerations and Legal Insights
- VAT Exemption for Bitcoin Exchange Transactions Under EU Court Ruling
- Netherlands Proposes New VAT Rules for Digital Platforms Offering Short-Term Rentals and Passenger Transport
